<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fish Rots From the Head</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justindavies.com.au/2008/03/19/the-fish-rots-from-the-head/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justindavies.com.au/2008/03/19/the-fish-rots-from-the-head/</link>
	<description>The essence of getting it right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 06:10:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin's brother</title>
		<link>http://justindavies.com.au/2008/03/19/the-fish-rots-from-the-head/comment-page-1/#comment-1214</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin's brother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justindavies.com.au/2008/03/19/the-fish-rots-from-the-head/#comment-1214</guid>
		<description>I used to work alongside one of the guys who introduced the idea into the big 4 firms audit fims to do a PEST and Porters analysis (minus the extra P &amp; the T) in order to understand the risk profile of each of their audit clients in addition to just verifying the numbers.  Since then I&#039;ve ended up in a profession which regularly uses the catch cry &quot;the fish rots from the head.&quot;  Nice to see this all wrapped up in a single cover, might be worth a look.

As I see it, the flaw with PEST &amp; Porters isn&#039;t necessarily the model itself, it&#039;s that the people doing it are either unable to see or comprehend some of the things around them, or aren&#039;t in a position to speak up about what they see or be heard when they do.  It&#039;d be really interesting to see if the Directors come up with the same results as those working for them who use similar tools.  I&#039;d hope the Boards would take a more long term view.  I&#039;d love to see a risk analysis by directors focused on &quot;risks that could arise after the current CEO has moved on.&quot;  That&#039;d be interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to work alongside one of the guys who introduced the idea into the big 4 firms audit fims to do a PEST and Porters analysis (minus the extra P &amp; the T) in order to understand the risk profile of each of their audit clients in addition to just verifying the numbers.  Since then I&#8217;ve ended up in a profession which regularly uses the catch cry &#8220;the fish rots from the head.&#8221;  Nice to see this all wrapped up in a single cover, might be worth a look.</p>
<p>As I see it, the flaw with PEST &amp; Porters isn&#8217;t necessarily the model itself, it&#8217;s that the people doing it are either unable to see or comprehend some of the things around them, or aren&#8217;t in a position to speak up about what they see or be heard when they do.  It&#8217;d be really interesting to see if the Directors come up with the same results as those working for them who use similar tools.  I&#8217;d hope the Boards would take a more long term view.  I&#8217;d love to see a risk analysis by directors focused on &#8220;risks that could arise after the current CEO has moved on.&#8221;  That&#8217;d be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
